Evidence mapPaperPMID 41709735Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Cytoprotection Concepts for Ischemic Stroke in the Recanalization Era.

Johannes Boltze, Marc Fisher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johannes BoltzeUniversity of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3956-4164
Marc FisherDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recanalization therapies for ischemic stroke, in particular endovascular thrombectomy, have revolutionized acute stroke management. Cytoprotective approaches were unsuccessfully tested in the pre-recanalization era but have seen a renaissance in translational research and early clinical trials as a potential intervention to augment the impact of recanalization therapies. The new clinical trial approaches in which cytoprotective therapies are now being applied require refinement of cytoprotective application strategies. This has a profound impact on both preclinical translational and clinical research. This review summarizes current cytoprotection concepts and explains their rationale based on ischemic stroke pathophysiology and provides an overview of cytoprotection approaches currently under clinical assessment. Preclinical assessment of novel cytoprotective paradigms will require advanced in vivo testing in models resembling human stroke patients as much as possible. The review therefore also describes ways to improve preclinical and translational research with respect to comorbidities and other aspects impacting stroke pathophysiology. Moreover, the role of modern brain imaging approaches is discussed including their use as potential biomarkers or patient selection tools. The review further provides detailed considerations of novel clinical trial design features for cytoprotection trials in the context of recanalization therapies and provides an outlook on potential future research approaches.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCytoprotectionIschemic StrokeStrokeAnimalsHumansThrombectomyTranslational Research, Biomedicalbrain imagingclinical trialcytoprotectionischemic strokeneuroprotectionrecanalizationtranslational research

Identifiers

PMID41709735
PMCPMC13042654

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.