Evidence mapPaperPMID 41710121Full record

ReviewSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2026

Recent Trends in Cannabis Use in Adults Ages 60 Years and Older.

Rachel E Thayer, Elizabeth Anquillare, Juliamaria Coromac-Medrano, Emily E Hardin, Kyle Hatcher, Greta E Hermann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel E ThayerPsychology Department, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1333-8142
Elizabeth AnquillarePsychology Department, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Juliamaria Coromac-MedranoPsychology Department, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Emily E HardinPsychology Department, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Kyle HatcherPsychology Department, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Greta E HermannPsychology Department, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review highlights the growing population of older adults (OA) who use cannabis and health considerations of cannabis use especially relevant to aging. The majority of OA who endorse using cannabis also report choosing it for medical purposes, most commonly to target symptoms of pain, insomnia, anxiety, and depression. However, many OA who use cannabis also do not discuss their use with their medical providers, and additional controlled clinical trials are needed to delineate which symptoms cannabis can successfully alleviate and any conditions or circumstances for which it is contraindicated. Further, emerging research in younger populations has documented possible cardiovascular risks of heavy cannabis use, and this area has yet to be thoroughly investigated in aging adults despite risk for vascular and other forms of dementia. Preclinical models are beginning to offer insight into health effects of cannabis use with aging, including cognition and dementia risk. In particular, cannabis represents a possible treatment for cognitive decline and neurodegeneration in OA, but further research is needed to characterize effects of cannabis use in healthy aging versus dementia processes.

Indexed as

agingcardiovascular healthmarijuanamental healthpainsleep

Identifiers

PMID41710121
PMCPMC12912127

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.