ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Comparison of Interpretable Machine Learning Models Using Systemic Inflammation Index to Predict Preterm Birth in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) elevates preterm birth risk, highlighting the need for improved prediction methods to enhance outcomes. Current models show limited accuracy by ignoring some inflammatory biomarkers (eg, PLR, LMR, SII). Machine learning (ML) can better analyze complex patterns but remains underused for GDM preterm birth prediction. Objective: This study develops an interpretable ML model combining systemic inflammatory indices and traditional clinical markers to predict preterm birth in GDM. Enabling early risk stratification at diagnosis, it facilitates timely interventions for this high-risk population. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 389 GDM patients, stratified into training (n=272) and temporal external validation (n=117) cohorts, and further classified by birth outcome (term/preterm). Using the training cohort, we developed and internally validated multiple ML models incorporating: (1) systemic inflammation indices, (2) traditional clinical indicators, and (3) their combination. The optimal model underwent temporal external validation and subsequent Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis for feature interpretation. To assess the robustness of our findings, sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Our cohort of 389 GDM patients included 53 preterm births (13.6%). Analysis revealed seven significant predictors combining systemic inflammatory markers and traditional clinical parameters. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model outperformed comparative algorithms (AUC-ROC: 0.932 vs Logit: 0.871, SVM: 0.847, RF: 0.917; AUC-PRC: 0.754 vs Logit: 0.686, SVM: 0.582, RF: 0.670). SHAP analysis identified five key determinants (two clinical and three inflammatory markers) as most influential for preterm birth prediction. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Conclusion: The XGBoost model outperforms in predicting GDM-related preterm birth by integrating traditional clinical and systemic inflammatory markers, enabling precise risk assessment to guide clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.