Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710255›Full record

ReviewBiochemia medica2026

National recommendations of the Working Group for Postanalytics of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine: Quality indicators of the postanalytical phase.

Sonja Podolar, Jelena Vlašić Tanasković, Anja Jokić, Lorena Honović, Vladimira Rimac, Jasna Leniček Krleža

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sonja PodolarMedical Biochemistry Laboratory, General Hospital "Dr. Tomislav Bardek", Koprivnica, Croatia.
Jelena Vlašić TanaskovićDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, General Hospital Pula, Pula, Croatia.
Anja JokićDepartment of Medical Biochemical Diagnostics, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases "Dr. Fran Mihaljević", Zagreb, Croatia.
Lorena HonovićDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, General Hospital Pula, Pula, Croatia.
Vladimira RimacDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Jasna Leniček KrležaDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, Children's Hospital Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the concept of quality as a degree of excellence, the term quality of laboratory work tells us how excellent our results are in all areas of laboratory work. Therefore, quality indicators have been introduced with the aim of monitoring and measuring quality. Quality indicators describe the efficiency of the laboratory process in the form of a numerical value, providing objective evidence of the conformity of the specified laboratory process with respect to predefined criteria. The Working Group for Postanalytics of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine has decided to describe the necessary steps in designing and monitoring quality indicators, with an emphasis on the quality of the postanalytical and post-postanalytical phase. The main purpose of these recommendations is to facilitate the incorporation of quality indicators into laboratories' daily routines. Laboratories in the Republic of Croatia are recommended to monitor three quality indicators in the postanalytical phase of laboratory work: turnaround time, withdrawn or retracted laboratory test reports, and notification of critical results. Additionally, two indicators are recommended in the post-postanalytical phase: monitoring issuance of laboratory test reports and monitoring user satisfaction. Harmonising acceptable performance limits and monitoring of the most commonly used quality indicators opens up the possibility of comparisons between laboratories and a uniform quality of laboratory services throughout the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesLaboratoriesLaboratories, ClinicalQuality Indicators, Health CareCroatiaHumansQuality ControlSocieties, Medicalcritical resultspostanalytical phasequality indicatorsquality managementturnaround time

Identifiers

PMID41710255
PMCPMC12912737

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.