Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710256›Full record

ArticlePulmonary circulation2026

Performance of Guideline-Recommended Approaches to Echocardiographic Investigation for Pulmonary Hypertension: Analysis of the CIPHER Study.

Luke S Howard, David G Kiely, Allan Lawrie, Bradley A Maron, Ioana R Preston, Stephan Rosenkranz, Mark Toshner, Martin R Wilkins, Yiu-Lian Fong, Debbie Quinn and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04193046 (A Prospective, Multicenter Study for the Identification of Biomarker Signatures for the Early Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04193046 early_phase1completednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicenter Study for the Identification of Biomarker Signatures for the Early Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2019 to 2022Enrolled907ConditionsHypertension, PulmonaryArmsBlood Sample
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Luke S HowardNational Pulmonary Hypertension Service, Hammersmith Hospital London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2822-210X
David G KielySheffield Pulmonary Vascular Disease Unit and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0184-6502
Allan LawrieNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London London UK.
Bradley A MaronDepartment of Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.
Ioana R PrestonDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Lahey Hospital and Medical Center Burlington Massachusetts USA.
Stephan RosenkranzDepartment of Cardiology and Cologne Cardiovascular Research Center (CCRC), Heart Center University Hospital Cologne Cologne Germany.
Mark ToshnerDepartment of Medicine University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Martin R WilkinsNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-1171
Yiu-Lian FongJohnson & Johnson New Brunswick New Jersey USA.
Debbie QuinnJohnson & Johnson Allschwil Switzerland.
Dimitri StamatiadisJohnson & Johnson Allschwil Switzerland.
Matthieu VilleneuveJohnson & Johnson Allschwil Switzerland.
Kelly M ChinDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-6723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines recommend different approaches to investigate for pulmonary hypertension (PH) by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We used data from the CIPHER study (NCT04193046) to prospectively evaluate TTE detection of PH. Participants newly referred to PH clinics who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) within 6 weeks and TTE within 60 days of enrolment (blinded central TTE reading) were classified by TTE probability of PH applying (i) the 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) TTE algorithm or (ii) right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) > 40 mmHg. For calculation of sensitivity and specificity, 'non-assessable' patients (peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity [TRV] missing or ≤ 2.8 m/s with missing data on other echocardiographic signs) and patients with missing RVSP were counted as PH-negative. Performance was measured against RHC-confirmed diagnosis of mean pulmonary artery pressure > 20 mmHg. Of 475 patients included, 345 (73%) had PH. Using the ESC/ERS algorithm, PH probability was high, intermediate, low and non-assessable for 198, 104, 22 and 151 patients and PH prevalence was 98%, 75%, 23%, and 44%, respectively. Seventy-three patients were missing RVSP and 292 had RVSP > 40 mmHg. The two TTE approaches achieved similar results: sensitivity was 79%-77%, specificity was 78%-79%. This prospective study of patients newly referred to PH centres for RHC found similar sensitivity and specificity when using either RVSP > 40 mmHg or the 2015 ESC/ERS TTE algorithm. Among patients who were low-probability or non-assessable by ESC/ERS algorithm, 42% had PH, highlighting the persistent need for additional non-invasive investigative tools.

Indexed as

diagnosisdiagnosticechocardiographyscreeningtransthoracic echocardiogram

Identifiers

PMID41710256
PMCPMC12910320

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.