ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Multicenter evaluation of prognostic nutritional index and systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting mortality among critically ill cardiovascular and cerebrovascular patients with varied glucose metabolism: a machine learning-based cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Critically ill patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases face high mortality risks, necessitating precise prognostic tools. Current models lack granularity in assessing glucose metabolic subgroups, while isolated use of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) has limitations. This study evaluates their combined predictive value for mortality across glucose metabolic profiles using machine learning. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,698 patients from the MIMIC-IV database (2008-2019), stratified by glucose metabolic status: normal glucose regulation (NGR), prediabetes (Pre-DM), and diabetes mellitus (DM). Prognostic associations and discrimination performance were evaluated using Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and ROC curves. Machine learning models-including logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM-were developed based on Boruta-selected features to predict 28-day and 90-day all-cause mortality. Model performance was assessed using AUC, accuracy, and F1-score. To externally validate the machine learning models, we incorporated an independent cohort of critically ill cardiovascular and cerebrovascular patients (n = 1,194) from two tertiary hospitals in China: The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University and Qingdao Municipal Hospital. Results: Higher PNI was associated with reduced mortality, whereas elevated SII predicted higher mortality risk. The combined PNI-SII model outperformed individual indices across glucose subgroups, showing the best performance in Pre-DM patients (AUC = 0.775 for 28-day mortality). PNI's protective effect was attenuated in the DM group, while SII remained consistently predictive. Machine learning models confirmed PNI and SII as top-ranking mortality predictors, particularly in NGR and Pre-DM populations. External validation demonstrated robust generalizability of the models, with comparable AUCs and calibration metrics across the independent Chinese cohort, supporting cross-center applicability. Conclusion: Integration of PNI and SII improves risk stratification and mortality prediction among critically ill patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, especially those with prediabetes. The machine learning models exhibited strong generalizability when externally validated using real-world data from two tertiary hospitals, underscoring their potential for broader clinical application and personalized decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.