Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710291›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2026

Intraspinal versus Extraspinal Acupotomy Decompression, or Their Combination, for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Protocol for a Three-Arm, Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial.

Wenlong Yang, Hailiang Liu, Muqing Liu, Lei Liu, Fangming Liu, Zike Dong, Xueqi Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenlong YangSchool of Acupuncture-Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Hailiang LiuDepartment of Pain Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Institute of Anesthesia and Respiratory Critical Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Muqing LiuSchool of Acupuncture-Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Lei LiuDepartment of Pain Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Institute of Anesthesia and Respiratory Critical Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Fangming LiuDepartment of Pain Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Institute of Anesthesia and Respiratory Critical Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Zike DongSchool of Acupuncture-Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xueqi LiSchool of Acupuncture-Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acupotomy is a minimally invasive procedure integrating traditional Chinese medicine principles with modern anatomy. While effective for low back pain in lumbar disc herniation (LDH), its efficacy for radicular symptoms from nerve root compression remains limited. A novel technique, intraspinal acupotomy decompression, targets the meningovertebral ligaments (MVL) to alleviate neural compression. This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of intraspinal decompression, extraspinal decompression, and their combination for LDH. Methods: This is a three-arm, randomized, single-center, single-blind (assessor-blinded) controlled trial. Due to the nature of the interventions, participants and practitioners cannot be blinded. The planned sample size is 210 eligible LDH patients aged 20-85, who will be randomly allocated to one of three groups (n=70 each): the extraspinal acupotomy group, the intraspinal acupotomy group, or the combined group. All groups will receive one treatment session per week for four weeks. The primary outcomes are pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) and lumbar function (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score, JOA), assessed at baseline, 4 weeks (post-treatment), and 8 weeks (primary endpoint). The secondary outcomes include quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey, SF-36) and adverse events, assessed at 8 weeks. Conclusion: This study will provide high-quality evidence on the efficacy of a novel intraspinal acupotomy technique. The findings will help determine the optimal acupotomy decompression strategy for LDH, potentially offering a more effective minimally invasive option for patients with radicular symptoms. Trial Registration: International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry (ITMCTR2025001872). Registered on 25 September 2025.

Indexed as

acupotomyintraspinal decompressionlumbar disc herniationrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41710291
PMCPMC12912137

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.