ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Intraspinal versus Extraspinal Acupotomy Decompression, or Their Combination, for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Protocol for a Three-Arm, Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nucleus Pulposus Resorption Following a Paraspinal Hook-Needle Intervention for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Acupotomy at spinal acupoints for primary insomnia: an exploration of therapeutic effectiveness.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Acupotomy for Cervical Spondylosis-Related Neck Pain: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acupotomy is a minimally invasive procedure integrating traditional Chinese medicine principles with modern anatomy. While effective for low back pain in lumbar disc herniation (LDH), its efficacy for radicular symptoms from nerve root compression remains limited. A novel technique, intraspinal acupotomy decompression, targets the meningovertebral ligaments (MVL) to alleviate neural compression. This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of intraspinal decompression, extraspinal decompression, and their combination for LDH. Methods: This is a three-arm, randomized, single-center, single-blind (assessor-blinded) controlled trial. Due to the nature of the interventions, participants and practitioners cannot be blinded. The planned sample size is 210 eligible LDH patients aged 20-85, who will be randomly allocated to one of three groups (n=70 each): the extraspinal acupotomy group, the intraspinal acupotomy group, or the combined group. All groups will receive one treatment session per week for four weeks. The primary outcomes are pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) and lumbar function (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score, JOA), assessed at baseline, 4 weeks (post-treatment), and 8 weeks (primary endpoint). The secondary outcomes include quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey, SF-36) and adverse events, assessed at 8 weeks. Conclusion: This study will provide high-quality evidence on the efficacy of a novel intraspinal acupotomy technique. The findings will help determine the optimal acupotomy decompression strategy for LDH, potentially offering a more effective minimally invasive option for patients with radicular symptoms. Trial Registration: International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry (ITMCTR2025001872). Registered on 25 September 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.