ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Pharmaceutical Care Through Women's Eyes: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study in Jordan.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Females play a central role in health-related decision-making for their families. This study aims to evaluate the satisfaction of female patients with pharmaceutical services in Jordan. Patients and Methods: This is an online cross-sectional survey study that was conducted in Jordan between February 13 Results: A total of 637 females participated in this study. Overall, patients' satisfaction with pharmaceutical services was positive. Moreover, 36.1% expressed excellent satisfaction with pharmacy services overall. Some areas showed room for improvement, only 14.8% rated the pharmacists' frequency of checking on medication effectiveness as excellent, and 20.3% rated the pharmacists' interest in their health as excellent. Participants with monthly income of 1000-1500 Jordanian dinars were more than twice as likely to report higher satisfaction compared to those earning less than 500 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-3.99, p = 0.006). Visiting government center pharmacies (aOR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.82, p = 0.009) or government hospitals (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21-0.84; p = 0.014) was associated with significantly lower odds of satisfaction compared to those visiting community pharmacy. Conclusion: This study indicates that female patients in Jordan have a positive overall satisfaction with pharmaceutical services. However, training Jordanian pharmacists on updated medication information, pharmaceutical services, communications, and follow-up with patients during their treatment is required to increase satisfaction with pharmacy services and patients' health specifically in governmental healthcare settings; which warrant targeted policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.