ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Limited Utility of the CALLY Index in Enhancing Mortality Prediction for Trauma Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate prognostication for trauma patients in intensive care units (ICUs) remains challenging. This study investigated whether incorporating the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index into traditional ICU scoring systems could enhance mortality prediction for trauma patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 1242 trauma patients hospitalized to a Level I trauma center ICU from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2023. The CALLY index was computed using the formula = [albumin (g/dL) × lymphocyte count (10 Results: Integration of the CALLY index with APACHE II resulted in a minimal AUC increase from 0.811 to 0.812. It did not alter the AUC for MPM II, MPM24 II, or MPM48 II models (0.826, 0.845, and 0.832, respectively). For TRISS, adding the CALLY index slightly decreased the AUC from 0.731 to 0.725. The calibration curves suggest that adding the CALLY index did not markedly improve agreement between predicted and actual mortality. Discussion: Unlike its proven efficacy in chronic conditions, the CALLY index did not significantly enhance mortality prediction in trauma patients when combined with traditional scoring systems. The reason that CALLY index did not enhance predictive power may be attributed to the acute, dynamic nature of trauma physiology, which differs from the steady-state conditions observed in chronic diseases. Further research is required to develop or refine prognostic tools specifically tailored to the unique physiological responses of trauma patients in ICU settings. Conclusion: For ICU clinicians, these results imply that the CALLY index provides minimal improvement in mortality risk assessment for trauma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.