ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Application of Nursing Intervention Under the Guidance of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Who Underwent Pulmonary Nodules Resection.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has shown promise in improving postoperative outcomes, but its specific impact on pulmonary nodule resection has not been well explored. In this retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching, we evaluated the association between ERAS-guided care and postoperative outcomes after pulmonary nodule resection. Methods: Patients undergoing pulmonary nodule resection were retrospectively enrolled, and 168 propensity score-matched patients were analyzed. The included patients were divided into the control group receiving conventional nursing care and the ERAS group receiving care guided by the ERAS protocol. Postoperative complications, stress response indicators, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as pulmonary function parameters, were evaluated. Results: A significantly lower overall complication rate was observed in the ERAS group (5.9% vs 20.5%, p = 0.006) compared to the control group. Additionally, the ERAS group demonstrated a shorter postoperative drainage duration, shorter tracheal extubation time, and a decreased length of stay. Postoperative pulmonary function, as assessed by Forced Vital Capacity (FVC%), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1%), and the FEV1/FVC ratio, was significantly improved in the ERAS group (FVC%: 76.92 ± 11.68 vs 70.57 ± 11.92, p < 0.001; FEV1%: 68.97 ± 9.44 vs 63.53 ± 9.66, p < 0.001), indicating superior recovery. Furthermore, serum CRP and IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the ERAS group at 48 h postoperatively (p < 0.001 for both), suggesting a reduced inflammatory response. Conclusion: ERAS protocols are associated with significantly improved postoperative recovery following pulmonary nodule resection, including reduced complications, enhanced pulmonary function recovery and decreased inflammatory markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.