ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Dental pain management in medically compromised patients: A comprehensive review and proposal of an analgesic ladder.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Managing dental pain in medically compromised patients poses clinical challenges due to altered drug metabolism, systemic contraindications, and increased risk of adverse effects. Existing guidelines often lack specificity for this group, highlighting the need for a tailored approach to analgesic prescribing. This review aimed to survey the literature and propose an evidence-informed analgesic ladder for dental care in medically vulnerable patients. Methods: A comprehensive review was conducted using structured searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2000 to May 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic and narrative reviews, and clinical guidelines addressing dental analgesia in patients with conditions such as cardiovascular disease, renal or hepatic impairment, asthma, diabetes, and cancer. Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings were thematically analyzed by pain severity and patient-specific risk factors, forming the basis of a five-step analgesic ladder. Results: The proposed ladder offers a structured framework to guide dental clinicians in selecting analgesics based on pain intensity and patient medical conditions. It incorporates stepwise recommendations accounting for common comorbidities and contraindications, with emphasis on dose adjustment, combination therapy, and selective use of adjunctive analgesics. Conclusion: This review presents a practical, patient-centered analgesic ladder to support safer dental pain management in medically compromised individuals. Despite the limited availability of RCTs, this framework offers an evidence-informed tool for personalized dental pain care. Further research is needed to validate the model and explore the role of adjunctive analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.