ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Dietary dihydroquercetin alleviates age-related cognitive impairment in association with modulation of apoptosis and pyroptosis pathways.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the intensification of population aging, age-related cognitive decline has emerged as a significant global health issue. Neuroinflammation, neuronal apoptosis, and pyroptosis have been identified as key factors in neuronal loss, a hallmark of age-related neurodegenerative conditions. Dihydroquercetin (DHQ), a natural flavonoid and a new food resource, demonstrates remarkable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties; however, its capacity to mitigate cognitive impairment in context of apoptosis and pyroptosis remains to be fully elucidated. In this study, an ageing rat modelling by intraperitoneal injection of D-galactose was utilised to assess the therapeutic potential of DHQ. A comprehensive analytical technique, incorporating behavioural tests, TCM symptom scoring, histopathological evaluation (Hematoxylin-eosin staining and Nissl staining), ELISA, Western blotting, and molecular docking analysis, was performed to investigate its pharmacodynamic effects and potential mechanisms. DHQ supplementation significantly alleviated D-gal-induced aging phenotypes and improved learning and memory function in the Morris water maze test. Histopathological examinations indicated that DHQ mitigated neuronal damage and loss in the hippocampus whilst concomitantly increasing the number of Nissl bodies. Furthermore, DHQ administration suppressed neuroinflammation in hippocampus, as indicated by decreased levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. At the molecular level, DHQ treatment was associated with altered expression of proteins involved in apoptosis, specifically increasing the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2 and reducing the expression of the pro-apoptotic proteins BAX and CASP3. Crucially, DHQ supplementation significantly suppressed the activation of the TLR4/NF-κB/NLRP3/CASP1 pyroptosis-related pathway, as evidenced by decreased protein expression of TLR4, NF-κB p65, p-NF-κB p65, NLRP3, CASP1, and mature IL-1β. Molecular docking predictions suggested potential binding interactions between DHQ and key targets within both apoptotic and pyroptotic pathways. DHQ exerts a mitigating effect on age-associated cognitive impairment, possibly through its association with reduced neuroinflammation and dual modulation of neuronal apoptosis and the NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis pathway. This positions DHQ as a promising candidate for further investigation as a therapeutic agent or dietary supplement in ageing-related neurodegenerative conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.