SynthesisESC heart failure2026
Cardiovascular risk associated with polypharmacy in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polypharmacy is highly prevalent among patients with heart failure (HF), due to multimorbidity and guideline-directed pharmacotherapy. While polypharmacy aims to optimize management, it can increase the risk of drug-drug interactions and adverse drug events, which may compromise clinical outcomes. However, the evidence regarding the relationship between polypharmacy and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in HF populations remains limited. The aim of this study was to determine the association between polypharmacy and adverse CV outcomes among patients with HF. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the association between polypharmacy and adverse CV outcomes in HF. Relevant studies were identified through searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The primary outcomes included a composite CV endpoint and its individual components. Effect estimates, based on comparisons between the highest and lowest levels of polypharmacy, were pooled using random-effects models. Ten studies including 30 115 patients with HF were analyzed. Compared with those without polypharmacy, patients with polypharmacy had a significantly increased risk of the composite CV endpoint (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.15-1.39). Notably, polypharmacy was linked to a higher risk of HF hospitalization (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.28-1.56). No significant associations were found for CV death (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.81-1.41) or all-cause mortality (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.88-1.25). Polypharmacy in patients with HF was associated with increased risk of composite CV outcome and HF hospitalization, reflecting the complexity of managing multiple medications. These findings underscore the need for individualized medication reviews to minimize inappropriate prescribing and ensure continued delivery of evidence-based therapies. PROSPERO Registration Number CRD420251110556.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.