Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41711582›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2026

Accessing the DNA in Breast Tissue: Adhesive Cell Capture from Flow onto Fibers of Cellulose Papers.

Sihang Chen, Eva P Browne, Kathleen F Arcaro, Maria M Santore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sihang ChenDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-8757-9708
Eva P BrowneDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States.
Kathleen F ArcaroDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States.
Maria M SantoreDepartment of Polymer Science & Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst Massachusetts 01003, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3689-5064

Funding

Chemistry-Biology Interface Predoctoral Training GrantT32GM139789 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI ERIC Robert STRIETER · 2021 to 2026
$3.4M
Paper-based Breastmilk Collection System for Facile, In-Home UseR21CA236665 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI SANTORE, MARIA M. · 2021 to 2024
$567k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA236665NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epithelial cells in human breastmilk represent an underutilized tissue source for research on human breast health or, in future applications, molecular-level-based cancer screening or individualized assessment of cancer risk. It remains a challenge to collect the targeted species from the milk of lactating women and new mothers, individuals for whom laboratories may be inaccessible or for whom cancer screening is a low priority. A compact, mailable device, for instance based on paper, that removes liquid and collects DNA and other targeted components is preferred over mailing milliliters of refrigerated liquid. After establishing that human DNA in breastmilk resides mostly in its cells, we focus on cell capture, employing MCF-7 cells expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP-MCF-7) as a means to track cell progression through layers of papers, determine cell capture mechanisms, and evaluate device designs during cell flow and water removal. We show that, for the current cellulose papers, cell capture is largely an adhesive process rather than one of size-based filtration, with cells passing through layers of paper intact until they are captured. The numbers of tracer cells captured on different surfaces, from the device entrance to a liquid reservoir, are shown to be proportional to the human DNA retained at those locations. In a simple model for milk, in which bovine serum albumin is added to cell suspensions, 1% protein minimally interferes but 5% protein blocks cell capture, further supporting a model of adhesion as opposed to filtration (size-based) retention. Further, the staggering of paper porosity to produce slower liquid travel through the device facilitates greater cell capture in regions with large pores, likely a result of the impact of wall shear rate on cell capture. Engineering calculations for estimated wall shear rates inside the papers revealed that the flow dependence of capture in paper layers behaves similarly to established epithelial cell capture in shear flow chambers.

Indexed as

BreastCell SeparationCelluloseDNAMilk, HumanAnimalsCell AdhesionFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsCelluloseDNAbreastmilkcell captureDNA retentionfield deployablehuman milkspot cards for human milk

Identifiers

PMID41711582
PMCPMC12927637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.