ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
[Development of a measure of functional health literacy: application of Item Response Theory].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a measure of functional health literacy (FHL) using Item Response Theory (IRT) to collect validity evidence of the created measure (convergent validity) and to propose cut-off points for the latent FHL trait. A methodological study was carried out with data from a population-based cross-sectional study. Data were collected from October 2023 to March 2024 in households in five Brazilian municipalities. A reduced and adapted version of the health literacy test was used to create the Functional Health Literacy test (FHLT) with the Samejima Gradual Response Model and IRT. Convergent validity was assessed by comparing functional health literacy measures with age, schooling, and economic class. The latent class model was used to categorize the scores generated by IRT. The sample consisted of 1,181 participants, half of whom were aged from 30 to 59 years. All FHLT items showed good discrimination. Convergent validity analysis showed a significant decrease in the means of the latent functional health literacy trait in participants with older age, low education, and lower socioeconomic classes. The model of three latent classes showed the best fit, defining three functional health literacy levels: inadequate, limited, and adequate. The FHLT was made available on an app for research and clinical practice. The results indicated the good psychometric performance of the FHLT in assessing functional health literacy levels, providing the first evidence of its validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.