ArticleActa parasitologica2026
Mechanistic and Synergistic Evaluation of Amodiaquine-Isometamidium Combination Against Trypanosoma evansi: Integrated In Silico-In-Vitro Insights.
Article in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrypanosoma evansi (T. evansi) is the causative agent of surra, and it remains a serious threat to livestock health and productivity. This study aimed was to evaluate the trypanocidal potential of amodiaquine (AQ), alone and in combination with isometamidium chloride (IC), against T. evansi, using both in-silico and in-vitro testing.
methodsComputational testing involved induced-fit docking of AQ which trypanothione reductase (TR), followed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and downstreampost-MD simulation analyses, intended to guide mechanistic hypotheses. In-vitro assays included drug sensitivity profiling across ten T. evansi isolates, checkerboard synergy testing, time–dependent kinetics, and qRT-PCR–based transcriptional analysis. Statistical tests included non-linear regression for IC90 estimation, one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA.
resultsMolecular docking revealed favorable AQ–TR interactions (Glide gscore –9.59 kcal/mol), further stabilized in MD simulations (RMSD 1.04 Å, RMSF 0.64 Å). MM-GBSA analysis yielded a favorable binding free energy (ΔG bind –27.52 kcal/mol). In-vitro, AQ had the IC90 values ranging from 4.27 to 69.29 µg/mL, whereas that of IC ranged from 4.49 to 31.01 ng/mL. Combination treatment significantly reduction in effective concentrations (AQ 8 µg/mL + IC 8 ng/mL vs. AQ 69.29 µg/mL, IC 31.01 ng/mL), with a synergistic FICI of 0.37 and complete clearance in high-dose time–kill assays. Upregulation of TR, TS, and TH under drug pressure was confirmed through qRT-PCR, which was the most pronounced with combination regimens (p < 0.05).
conclusionCollectively, these findings revealed AQ–IC co-administration is a mechanistically rational and pharmacodynamically synergistic strategy against drug-resistant T. evansi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41712103What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.