Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712103›Full record

ArticleActa parasitologica2026

Mechanistic and Synergistic Evaluation of Amodiaquine-Isometamidium Combination Against Trypanosoma evansi: Integrated In Silico-In-Vitro Insights.

Waqas Ahmad, Naeem Rasool, Mehmood Ahmad, Muhammad Yasin Tipu, Tehreem Fayyaz, Usama Bin Naeem, Sadaf Aroosa, Rana Muhammad Zahid Mushtaq

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Waqas AhmadDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8485-9557
Naeem RasoolAl-Shifa Institute of Health Sciences, Narowal, 51600, Pakistan.
Mehmood AhmadDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7497-6418
Muhammad Yasin TipuDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan. yasintipu@uvas.edu.pk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6996-7258
Tehreem FayyazDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Usama Bin NaeemDepartment of Pharmacology, Riphah College of Veterinary Sciences, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Sadaf AroosaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Biosciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Rana Muhammad Zahid MushtaqDivision of Infection Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrypanosoma evansi (T. evansi) is the causative agent of surra, and it remains a serious threat to livestock health and productivity. This study aimed was to evaluate the trypanocidal potential of amodiaquine (AQ), alone and in combination with isometamidium chloride (IC), against T. evansi, using both in-silico and in-vitro testing.

methodsComputational testing involved induced-fit docking of AQ which trypanothione reductase (TR), followed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and downstreampost-MD simulation analyses, intended to guide mechanistic hypotheses. In-vitro assays included drug sensitivity profiling across ten T. evansi isolates, checkerboard synergy testing, time–dependent kinetics, and qRT-PCR–based transcriptional analysis. Statistical tests included non-linear regression for IC90 estimation, one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA.

resultsMolecular docking revealed favorable AQ–TR interactions (Glide gscore –9.59 kcal/mol), further stabilized in MD simulations (RMSD 1.04 Å, RMSF 0.64 Å). MM-GBSA analysis yielded a favorable binding free energy (ΔG bind –27.52 kcal/mol). In-vitro, AQ had the IC90 values ranging from 4.27 to 69.29 µg/mL, whereas that of IC ranged from 4.49 to 31.01 ng/mL. Combination treatment significantly reduction in effective concentrations (AQ 8 µg/mL + IC 8 ng/mL vs. AQ 69.29 µg/mL, IC 31.01 ng/mL), with a synergistic FICI of 0.37 and complete clearance in high-dose time–kill assays. Upregulation of TR, TS, and TH under drug pressure was confirmed through qRT-PCR, which was the most pronounced with combination regimens (p < 0.05).

conclusionCollectively, these findings revealed AQ–IC co-administration is a mechanistically rational and pharmacodynamically synergistic strategy against drug-resistant T. evansi.

Indexed as

AmodiaquinePhenanthridinesTrypanocidal AgentsTrypanosomaAnimalsComputer SimulationDrug SynergismMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationNADH, NADPH OxidoreductasesParasitic Sensitivity TestsAmodiaquineisometamidium chlorideNADH, NADPH OxidoreductasesPhenanthridinesTrypanocidal Agentstrypanothione reductaseAmodiaquineIsometamidium chlorideMolecular dockingMolecular dynamics simulationQRT-PCRSynergistic activityTrypanosoma evansi

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.