Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712557›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Open-source framework for detecting bias and overfitting for large pathology images.

Anders Sildnes, Nikita Shvetsov, Masoud Tafavvoghi, Vi Ngoc-Nha Tran, Kajsa Møllersen, Lill-Tove Rasmussen Busund, Thomas K Kilvær, Lars Ailo Bongo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anders SildnesDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0141-6112
Nikita ShvetsovDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-3702
Masoud TafavvoghiDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Vi Ngoc-Nha TranDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Kajsa MøllersenDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0619-7276
Lill-Tove Rasmussen BusundDepartment of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Thomas K KilværDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1669-0117
Lars Ailo BongoDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even foundational models trained on large-scale datasets may learn to rely on non-relevant artifacts such as background color or color intensity, leading to overfitting and/or bias. To ensure the robustness of deep learning applications, there is a need for methods to detect and remove the use of these artifacts. Existing debugging methods are often domain- and model-architecture-specific, and may be computationally expensive, hindering widespread use. We propose a model-architecture-agnostic framework to debug deep learning models. To demonstrate the utility of our framework, we test it using a widely used dataset from histopathology, which has been tested in other literature. The dataset features very large images that typically demand large computational resources. We demonstrate that the framework can replicate known bias patterns in a pre-trained foundation model (Phikon-v2) and a self-trained self-supervised model (MoCo v1). Our framework contributes to the development of more reliable, accurate, and generalizable models for WSI analysis, and is available as an open-source tool integrated with the MONAI framework at https://github.com/uit-hdl/feature-inspect.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsArtifactsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41712557
PMCPMC12919778

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.