ArticlePloS one2026
Open-source framework for detecting bias and overfitting for large pathology images.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even foundational models trained on large-scale datasets may learn to rely on non-relevant artifacts such as background color or color intensity, leading to overfitting and/or bias. To ensure the robustness of deep learning applications, there is a need for methods to detect and remove the use of these artifacts. Existing debugging methods are often domain- and model-architecture-specific, and may be computationally expensive, hindering widespread use. We propose a model-architecture-agnostic framework to debug deep learning models. To demonstrate the utility of our framework, we test it using a widely used dataset from histopathology, which has been tested in other literature. The dataset features very large images that typically demand large computational resources. We demonstrate that the framework can replicate known bias patterns in a pre-trained foundation model (Phikon-v2) and a self-trained self-supervised model (MoCo v1). Our framework contributes to the development of more reliable, accurate, and generalizable models for WSI analysis, and is available as an open-source tool integrated with the MONAI framework at https://github.com/uit-hdl/feature-inspect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.