Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712618›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

A dynamical anthrax toxin nanopore biosensor for high-fidelity single-peptide classification.

Jennifer M Colby, Bryan A Krantz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer M ColbyMolecular Toxicology Graduate Program, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Bryan A KrantzDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4911-5824

Funding

Physical Principles of Bacterial Toxin Translocation across MembranesR01AI077703 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KRANTZ, BRYAN ANDREW · 2008 to 2017
$3.3M
Molecular mechanisms of anthrax toxin unfolding and translocationR21AI177237 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KRANTZ, BRYAN ANDREW · 2025 to 2025
$425k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077703NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI177237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopore sensing holds the potential to revolutionize proteomics, yet current methods often rely on ensemble aggregation, where thousands of events must be statistically aggregated or averaged to identify a protein or peptide signature. While effective for pure samples, this aggregation strategy fails in complex, heterogeneous mixtures where the identity of individual molecules must be determined in real-time. Here, we demonstrate high-fidelity classification of peptides from single, individual translocation events, eliminating the need for ensemble averaging. This sensitivity is achieved using the anthrax toxin protective antigen (PA) nanopore. Unlike static pores used more generally, the PA pore's dynamic active-site clamps generate information-rich, multi-state signals. These clamps also enable the utility of high-affinity capture, permitting analysis at low nanomolar concentrations. We developed a machine learning framework that makes inferences on these dynamical multi-state signals and achieves ~91% accuracy on single events. This work establishes a framework for true single-molecule proteomics, enabling the resolution of complex mixtures that bulk aggregation methods cannot decipher.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialBacterial ToxinsBiosensing TechniquesNanoporesPeptidesMachine LearningProteomicsanthrax toxinAntigens, BacterialBacterial ToxinsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID41712618
PMCPMC12935300

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.