Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41713091›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Comparative and combined effects of in ovo probiotic injection and early feeding on growth development, intestinal morphology, ileum microbiota, digestive enzymes, and immune responses in broiler chickens.

Ali Hassanlou, Shahriyar Khalilzadeh, Bahareh Sadat-Hosseini, Roya Hassani, Motaleb Ebrahimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ali HassanlouDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Arak University, 38156-8-8349 Arak, Iran.
Shahriyar KhalilzadehDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ka. C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. Electronic address: 1980shahriyar@gmail.com.
Bahareh Sadat-HosseiniDepartment of Animal Science, East Tehran Branch, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
Roya HassaniBachelor's degree graduate, Water and Soil Department, Imam Khomeini Higher Education Institute, Karaj, Iran.
Motaleb EbrahimiDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of in-ovo injection and early feeding on performance, intestinal morphology, ileum microbiota, digestive enzyme activities, and immune system development in broiler chickens. 1,800 Ross 308 eggs were divided into 6 treatment groups with 10 replicates of 30 eggs in a completely randomized 3 × 2 factorial design. The experimental treatments included six groups as follows: NI-NF: Non-injected eggs and as hatches chicks with 48 h delayed access to feed (negative control); NI-YF: Non-injected eggs and as hatched chicks with immediate nutrient gel access; SL-NF: In-ovo saline injection and delayed feed access; SL-YF: In-ovo saline injection and as hatched chicks with immediate nutrient gel access; PB-NF: In-ovo probiotic injection (100 μL per egg) and delayed feed access; PB-YF: In-ovo probiotic injection and as hatched chicks with immediate nutrient gel access. Hatchability did not differ among treatments (P = 0.721). Chicks from probiotic-injected eggs (PB-NF and PB-YF) exhibited higher body weight at hatch than those from non-injected (NI-NF, NI-YF) and saline-injected (SL-NF, SL-YF) eggs (P = 0.043). At 48 h post-hatch, the PB-YF group recorded the greatest body weight (P = 0.004). During 11-24 days, PB-YF birds showed the highest BWG, differing from all other groups (P = 0.004). From 25-42 days, PB-YF, SL-YF, and NI-YF maintained higher BWG values compared with NI-NF and SL-NF (P = 0.017). At all ages, chicks with early feeding access (NI-YF, SL-YF, and PB-YF) exhibited significantly greater villus height compared with their delayed-fed counterparts (NI-NF, SL-NF, and PB-NF) (P < 0.05). At 10 days, the PB-NF group exhibited the lowest C. perfringens and E. coli population, significantly lower than NI-NF and SL-NF (P = 0.034; P = 0.001). At 10 days, PB-YF group chicks exhibited the highest amylase, lipase and protease activity (P < 0.05). A significant interaction between in ovo probiotic injection and early feeding was detected for IgM, IgA, IL-10, and IL-6 at 3 and 10 days of age (P < 0.05). At day 3, the PB-YF group showed the lowest corticosterone level (P = 0.001), while no significant difference was detected at day 10 (P = 0.128). In conclusion, in ovo probiotic injection improved early survival, immunity, and initial growth, whereas early feeding provided more persistent advantages throughout the production period; together, these strategies acted synergistically to optimize broiler health, gut development, and overall performance.

Indexed as

ChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunity, InnateIntestinesProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDigestionFemaleIleumInjectionsOvumRandom AllocationDigestive enzymeEarly feedingImmunityIn-ovoIntestinal development

Identifiers

PMID41713091
PMCPMC12934303

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.