Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41713515›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2026

Incorporating Intensity Modulated Total Body Irradiation (IMRT-TBI) Into Future Cooperative Group Clinical Trials: An NRG Hematologic Malignancies Working Group-Led Report From the National Clinical Trials Network.

Nataliya Kovalchuk, Eric A Simiele, Michael LaRiviere, Susan M Hiniker, Michael Soike, Chunhui Han, Jeffrey Wong, Savita Dandapani, Kiran Kumar, David Parsons and 17 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Nataliya KovalchukDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Eric A SimieleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Michael LaRiviereDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Susan M HinikerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Michael SoikeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Chunhui HanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Jeffrey WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Savita DandapaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Kiran KumarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
David ParsonsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Jose R TeruelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York.
Naamit K GerberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York.
Bingqi GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sheen CherianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Tze Y LimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kujtim LatifiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Nicholas B FiguraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Deepak K ShresthaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
John GreculaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Austin J SimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Rakesh R ParikhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Brunswick, New Jersey.
Andrea C LoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Koren SmithIROC Rhode Island QA Center, Lincoln, Rhode Island.
John P PlastarasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ying XiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Bradford S HoppeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida; Department of Radiation Oncology, Nemours Children's Health, Jacksonville, Florida.
Sarah A MilgromDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: sarah.milgrom@cuanschutz.edu.

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
IROC: Enhancing local enrolling site radiological data capture capabilities for NCTN trialsU24CA180803 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI Thomas J. FitzGerald, MICHAEL V KNOPP · 2014 to 2026
$116.2M
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network DCC- The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.U24HL138660 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Steven M. DeVine, Mehdi Hussain Hamadani · 2017 to 2026
$71.4M
Easy-to-read Informed Consent for HCT Clinical TrialsU10HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2011 to 2016
$43.8M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180803NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL069294NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL138660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasingly used for total body irradiation (TBI) due to its ability to deliver myeloablative doses while sparing radiosensitive organs. To enable consistent evaluation in future National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) studies, the NRG Hematologic Malignancies Working Group (HMWG) convened IMRT-TBI experts and NCTN leaders to develop consensus recommendations for standardized multi-institutional implementation. A 47-question survey was distributed to NRG institutions utilizing total body irradiation treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT-TBI) to characterize current planning and delivery practices. Responses were analyzed for commonalities and variations. A multidisciplinary working group reviewed survey findings, developed consensus-based technical and clinical recommendations, and created a standardized template for IMRT-TBI integration into NCTN protocols. Topics included simulation, contouring, planning, organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints, quality assurance (QA), image guided radiation therapy, commissioning, credentialing, and safeguards for clinical trial conduct. Eight institutions with collective experience treating more than 750 patients with IMRT-TBI responded. Most centers used volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the upper body with anteroposterior/posteroanterior fields to the lower body, 3 to 9 isocenters, lower dose rates for lung fields (100-200 MU/min), and no physical bolus. Common OAR constraints included lungs mean dose <8 Gy, kidneys mean dose <6 to 8 Gy, and lenses maximum dose <90% of prescription. All respondents used auto-segmentation; 50% used auto-planning. QA practices varied, but patient-specific QA passing rates were high (>95% with 3%/2 mm gamma). Consensus recommendations for clinical trial use were established, including standardized planning target volume definitions, OAR sparing goals, dosimetric constraints, QA requirements, and credentialing processes. IMRT-TBI offers the potential for reduced toxicity and improved dose precision compared with total body irradiation treated with a 2-dimensional technique, but its complexity requires careful standardization in multi-institutional trials. The NRG HMWG and collaborating NCTN experts developed the consensus-based technical and clinical framework for incorporating IMRT-TBI into cooperative group protocols. Adoption of these recommendations will facilitate consistent implementation and enable rigorous evaluation of outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHematologic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedWhole-Body IrradiationCredentialingHumansOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41713515
PMCPMC13166410

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.