ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
Predictive genetic testing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): Experiences of decision-making and engagement with UK genetic counseling services.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predictive genetic testing enables at-risk relatives of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, also known as motor neuron disease or MND) to find out if they have inherited the genetic variant identified in their family member and have an increased chance of developing symptoms. As research progresses, eligibility for and interest in predictive testing is increasing. This paper explores the experiences of people making decisions about predictive testing and identifies their information needs over the process. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 14 individuals from across the United Kingdom who had, or were considering, predictive testing for ALS. Interviews were carried out via video call or face-to-face between March and September 2023, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive framework analysis. Findings illustrate a range of experiences. Interviews suggest variation in practice in terms of the structure of the genetic counseling process and the content of information given. Some expressed positive experiences of genetic counseling, and valued feeling listened to, understood, and supported. Others perceived barriers to accessing testing, felt the information provided was directive or not sufficient to support their concerns and decision-making. Information needs varied, and whilst people felt satisfied, there were also diverse, unmet information and support needs raised throughout the decision-making process and beyond. This evidence has been used to support the development of a patient decision aid for predictive genetic testing in ALS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.