ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2026
A novel NLP-based method and algorithm to discover RNA-binding protein (RBP) motifs, contexts, binding preferences, and interactions.
Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging sequence-structure motifs and genetic variants for genome-wide dynamic RNA-protein interaction profiling.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are essential modulators in the regulation of mRNA processing. The binding patterns, interactions, and functions of most RBPs are not well-characterized. Previous studies have shown that motif context is an important contributor to RBP binding specificity, but its precise role remains unclear. Despite recent computational advances to predict RBP binding, existing methods are challenging to interpret and largely lack a categorical focus on RBP motif contexts and RBP-RBP interactions. There remains a need for interpretable predictive models to disambiguate the contextual determinants of RBP binding specificity in vivo. Here, we present a novel and comprehensive pipeline to address these knowledge gaps. We devise a natural language processing-based method to deconstruct sequences into entities comprising a target
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.