Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714563›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2026

Unconscious Fear Requires Attention to Distort Vision in Safe Context.

Xiqian Wu, Xilei Zhang, Liang Wang, Yi Jiang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiqian WuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Xilei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. zhangxilei@psych.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1805-5044
Liang WangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Yi JiangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-7301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite widespread exposure to stress and threats, why some develop anxiety while others do not remains unclear. We hypothesize that this discrepancy links to unconscious fear memory generalization in safe contexts, a poorly understood area. Here, we tested whether such memories unconsciously bias visual processing and if attention-based control suppresses this effect. Visual orientations paired with threat (in a threatening context) were rendered invisible via fast chromatic flicker above critical flicker-fusion frequency (CFF), then presented in a safe context. Experiment 1 (attended orientation discrimination task) and Experiment 2 (attended duration discrimination task vs. unattended central color detection task) were conducted. EEG revealed significant unconscious fear responses (CS+ vs. CS-) in attended conditions, positively correlated with broad-alpha power (replicated across experiments). No significant responses emerged for unattended stimuli, despite elevated alpha. These findings show unconscious fear distorts visual processing during generalization in a safe context, with top-down attention gating this effect via broad alpha oscillations-prioritizing it when attended and suppressing it when unattended.

Indexed as

Alpha oscillationsSignal-to-noise ratioTop-down attentionUnconscious fearVisual processing

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.