ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of antimicrobial activity of [1,2,4]triazolo[4, 3-a]quinoxaline derivatives individually and in combination with levofloxacin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The need to develop new and effective antimicrobial compounds has become a fundamental requirement of the therapeutic system worldwide. In this study, a series of synthetic 4-amino triazoloquinoxaline derivatives were designed and synthesized. The chemical structure of these compounds was confirmed using spectroscopic methods (1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, FT-IR, and MS). Their antimicrobial activity against several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria was then evaluated. The results of biological experiments showed that the synthetic compounds 5b, 5d, and 5h derivatives have moderate antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans compared to some standard drugs. Non-toxic compounds were selected based on MTT and hemolysis assays, and their synergistic effect in combination with levofloxacin (LEV) was investigated. The findings confirmed the effectiveness of combination therapy in reducing the dose of LEV, compounds 5d and 5h against S. aureus and S. epidermidis, as well as 5d and 5b against resistant isolates of MRSA and P. aeruginosa, respectively, with a fractional inhibitory concentration index ≤ 0.5. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy confirmed the complete damage of S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and P. aeruginosa following exposure to the combination therapy of compounds 5b, 5d, and 5h with LEV. This new synergistic therapy has the potential to be used as a novel approach of treating infectious diseases after future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.