ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Robust and interpretable unit level causal inference in neural networks for pediatric myopia.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Objective pulse wave amplitude as a potential systemic correlate in childhood myopia: a digital TCM-based study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding causal mechanisms in deep learning is essential for clinical adoption, where interpretability and reliability are critical. Most existing AI systems act as black boxes, limiting transparency in medicine. We propose a causal inference framework integrated into neural networks to assess the influence of individual features on predictions. Using a prospective pediatric ophthalmology cohort of over 3000 children with longitudinal follow-up, our method estimates direct and indirect causal effects through intervention. Applied to myopia progression in children, our approach not only achieved good performance but also identified clinically plausible causal pathways. Refutation experiments with multiple falsification strategies confirm the robustness and reliability of causal effects. The approach is model-agnostic and suitable for digital health interventions requiring explainability. By incorporating unit-level causal reasoning into deep learning, this work advances transparent and reliable AI systems aligned with the goals of precision medicine and equitable healthcare.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.