ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Morning Blood Pressure and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between maternal morning blood pressure (BP) levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), including severe preeclampsia, target organ damage, preterm birth, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, small-for-gestational-age infants, and pregnancy loss, is not well understood. In a retrospective cohort study of 1833 high-risk singleton pregnancies with outpatient ambulatory BP monitoring, 26.7% had morning hypertension. Morning BP strongly correlated with non-morning daytime BP (Pearson r = 0.89) and nighttime BP (r = 0.78), but only moderately with office BP (r = 0.54). Compared to office BP, adding morning BP improved diagnostic accuracy for nighttime, masked, and non-morning daytime hypertension (Δ area under the curve 0.062 to 0.127, all P < 0.001). A J-shaped, non-linear association was observed between morning BP and the risk of composite APOs, with identified thresholds at systolic/diastolic BP ≥ 132/79 mmHg. Isolated morning hypertension, compared to isolated nighttime or non-morning daytime hypertension, did not independently increase composite APO risk. However, co-occurrence of morning hypertension with nighttime (odds ratio [OR] 3.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.34 to 4.27) or non-morning daytime (OR 3.41, 95% CI: 2.54 to 4.60) hypertension amplified the risks for APOs. The strongest association between co-occurring morning and nighttime hypertension and APO risk was observed between 28
Indexed as
Identifiers
41714712What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.