Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714774›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Water line biofilm regrowth dynamics in six wean-to-finish farms post peracetic acid water line cleaning and disinfection.

Gabrielle E Doughan, Becca K Walthart, Meredith B Petersen, Cora E Schau, Kristin J Skoland, Nubia R Macedo, Justin T Brown, Jessica L Bonnema, Danyang Zhang, Locke A Karriker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabrielle E DoughanSwine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA. wilsong2@iastate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1197-4758
Becca K WalthartSwine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Meredith B PetersenSwine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Cora E SchauSwine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Kristin J SkolandSwine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Nubia R MacedoVeterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Justin T BrownSwine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Jessica L BonnemaSwine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Danyang ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Locke A KarrikerSwine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water quality and water line management play a critical role in swine health; however, they are often overlooked aspects of swine production. Best practices for water line cleaning and disinfection in pig barns are limited, and a one-time (terminal) water line cleaning with peracetic acid (PAA) may reduce mineral scale and biofilm presence. The objective of this study was to evaluate swine water line biofilm regrowth dynamics in six commercial wean-to-finish farms on well water following application of 0.78% PAA. Water line samples were collected aseptically pre-treatment (0), after water lines had been flushed 24 h after PAA had been applied (1), and 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 42, 56, and 77 days post-treatment. Biofilm was quantified via aerobic and anaerobic standard plate counts. Results demonstrate a significant reduction in biofilm quantities pre- (0) and post-treatment (1), with over a three-log reduction in log 10 colony forming units (CFU) per mL (adjusted p-value = 0.0000). Biofilms regrew within three days and were not significantly different than pre-treatment (0) biofilm quantities. This demonstrates that administration of 0.78% PAA is effective at reducing biofilm quantities, however, long-term impacts are limited. Following labeled dosages and continuous water disinfectants should be considered for long term management.

Indexed as

BiofilmsDisinfectantsDisinfectionPeracetic AcidAnimalsFarmsSwineWater MicrobiologyDisinfectantsPeracetic AcidBiofilmPeracetic acidStandard plate countsWater linesWater quality

Identifiers

PMID41714774
PMCPMC13018522

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.