ArticleBMC surgery2026
Incidence of marginal ulcer after one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has proven to be a safe and effective choice for long-standing weight loss, associated complications have been described. Among them, marginal ulcer (MU) has been recognized as one of the more significant postoperative complications. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has currently been the third most common procedure overall in the world. Similar to RYGB, concerns have emerged for MU risk after OAGB. This study aimed to compare the incidence of MU after RYGB versus OAGB.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study that included 62 adult patients who underwent RYGB or OAGB and were followed up for a period of two years. The included patients underwent a complete general examination and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
resultsThe prevalence of MU in RYGB patients was 19.4%, whereas in OAGB patients, it was markedly lower at 3.2%, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.045). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of diabetes and the type of surgery (RYGB) were significant predictors for MU.
conclusionMarginal ulcers occurred at a relatively high rate after bypass surgery. OAGB demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of MUs compared to RYGB. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the RYGB procedure were significant predictors of MU after adjusting for the confounding factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.