ArticleMicrobiome2026
Cross-kingdom genomic variation in chicken gut microbiomes: insights from China's diverse local breeds.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe gut microbiome possesses substantial genetic diversity that supports microbial adaptation, but the genomic variation patterns across its prokaryotic and viral populations remain incompletely characterized.
resultsThrough integrated metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analysis of ten indigenous chicken breeds from China, we recovered 1527 representative prokaryotic MAGs, 37,555 representative DNA viral contigs, and 1867 representative RNA viral contigs (primarily comprising Bacillota/Bacteroidota, Uroviricota, and Lenarviricota/Pisuviricota, respectively). By integrating complementary short-read and long-read metagenomics with metatranscriptomics, we identified structural variants (SVs) and single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in these cross-kingdom genomes. Positive SV-SNV density correlations occurred consistently across all microbial groups, indicating coordinated mutational processes. DNA viruses exhibited the highest variant prevalence (86.9% SNVs, 47.7% SVs), with temperate phages accumulating significantly more variants than virulent phages. Functionally, prokaryotic variants accumulated in carbohydrate metabolism and amino acid metabolism, while viral variants demonstrated broad metabolic hijacking. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) was characterized by a strong virus-associated signature (69.40% of 536 events) and marked by an asymmetric pattern, with phage-to-bacteria (P-to-B) flow alone constituting 37.50% of all events. Random forest analysis revealed a strong bidirectional predictive relationship between SV and SNV densities across prokaryotic, DNA viral, and RNA viral populations, suggesting coupled genomic instability. Niche breadth emerged as a major driver of SNVs across kingdoms and was positively correlated with variant density. In prokaryotes, HGT events significantly shaped variant patterns. For viruses, genomic GC content was an important factor and consistently showed a negative correlation with SNV density in both DNA and RNA viruses.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that coordinated mutational processes and kingdom-specific intrinsic factors drive genomic variation, with viruses serving as key genetic exchange vectors in chicken gut ecosystems. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.