ArticleBMC psychology2026
Patients', caregivers' and healthcare workers' perspectives on integrating anxiety care in tuberculosis services in Pakistan: a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUp to 80% of active tuberculosis (TB) patients experience anxiety, threatening their treatment outcomes. The National TB Control Programme in Pakistan currently only provides mental health services for patients with multi-drug resistant TB, leaving those with drug sensitive TB (DSTB) unsupported. This study explored (1) experiences of anxiety and self-managed coping strategies used by patients with DSTB and their caregivers (2), current practice for the management of anxiety in DSTB patients, and (3) challenges and opportunities for implementation of an integrated care package for the management of anxiety in DSTB patients.
methodsFace-to-face interviews were conducted with nine healthcare workers, one service manager, 12 patients with DSTB and nine caregivers working in or attending four basic management units offering DSTB services in one province in Pakistan. The capability-opportunity-motivation-behaviour model was used to explore challenges and opportunities for implementation of the integrated care package. The data were analysed using framework analysis, then triangulated across participant groups.
resultsAll participant groups acknowledged that DSTB patients experience poor mental health including anxiety. Indeed, they needed prompting to focus on anxiety. No patients or caregivers had discussed anxiety in their TB consultations, instead patients used their own coping strategies and relied on caregiver support. Healthcare workers and the service manager reported a lack of guidelines and training. They used intuition and their own counselling strategies. All participant groups supported the idea of an integrated care package (high motivation), to improve patient well-being and aid recovery. Healthcare workers were highly motivated to deliver it themselves. In terms of capability and physical opportunity, healthcare workers recognised their lack of knowledge and skills, seeing training, resources, and protocols as essential. High patient workload and limited time in TB consultations were key barriers. Face-to-face appointments lasting less than 30 min on days when patients were already attending the facility were recommended.
conclusionsThis study provides important insights on feasibility and acceptability to inform the future implementation of an integrated package for anxiety management into routine DSTB services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.