ArticlePhysical review. E2026
Phase separation and coexistence in spatial coordination games between microbes.
Article in Physical review. E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pattern Formation in a Spatial Public Goods Dilemma due to Diffusive or Directed Motion.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- Pattern Formation in Agent-Based and PDE Models for Evolutionary Games with Payoff-Driven Motion.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dense, microbial communities are shaped by local interactions between cells. Both the nature of interactions, spanning antagonistic to cooperative, and the strength of interactions vary between and across microbial species and strains. These local interactions can influence the emergence and maintenance of microbial diversity. However, it remains challenging to link features of local interactions with spatially mediated coexistence dynamics given the significant variation in the microscopic mechanisms involved in cell-to-cell feedback. Here, we explore how microbial interactions over a broad range of ecological contexts spanning antagonism to cooperation can enable coexistence as spatially explicit domains emerge. To do so, we introduce and analyze a family of stochastic coordination games, where individuals do better when playing (i.e., interacting) with individuals of the same type than when playing with individuals of a different type. Using this game-theoretic framework, we show that the population dynamics for coordination games is governed by a double-well shaped interaction potential. We find that in a spatial setting this double-well potential induces phase separation, facilitating coexistence. Moreover, we show that for microbes engaged in symmetric coordination games, phase separation takes on a universal scaling that follows "Model A" coarsening, consistent with prior experimental observations for Vibrio cholerae mutual killers. Finally, we derive a partial differential equation equivalent of the spatial stochastic game, confirming both the double-well nature of spatial coordination games and the universality of phase separation. Altogether, this work extends prior findings on the link between microbial interactions and population structure and suggests generic mechanisms embedded in local interactions that can enable coexistence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41715816What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.