Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716034›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2026

Deep learning-based H&E-derived risk scores in colorectal cancer: associations with tumour morphology, biology, and predicted drug response.

Nic G Reitsam, Xiaofeng Jiang, Junhao Liang, Bianca Grosser, Veselin Grozdanov, Chiara Ml Loeffler, Marco Gustav, Tim Lenz, Hannah S Muti, Zunamys I Carrero and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Nic G ReitsamPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0070-3158
Xiaofeng JiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of PR China (UESTC), Chengdu, PR China.
Junhao LiangElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Bianca GrosserPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Veselin GrozdanovDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0825-7383
Chiara Ml LoefflerElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Marco GustavElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3598-5720
Tim LenzElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9034-2535
Hannah S MutiElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Zunamys I CarreroElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Nicholas P WestPathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0346-6709
Philip QuirkePathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-5444
Sebastian FoerschInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Moritz JesinghausInstitute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Wolfram MüllerPathologie Starnberg, Starnberg, Germany.
Tanwei YuanDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael HoffmeisterDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jitendra JonnagaddalaSchool of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
Nicholas J HawkinsSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
Robyn L WardMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Heike I GrabschPathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9520-6228
Bruno MärklPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Jakob N KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

European Union's Horizon Europe and Innovation Programme 101057091European Union's Horizon Europe and Innovation Programme 101096312German Academic Exchange Service 57616814German Cancer Aid 70115166German Cancer Aid 70115995German Federal Joint Committee 01VERSUSF21048German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01EO2101German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01ER0814German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01ER0815German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01ER1505AGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01ER1505BGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01KD2104AGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01KD2104CGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01KD2215AGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01KH0404German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01KT2302German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 031L0312AGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research NIHR213331German Federal Ministry of Health ZMVI1-2520DAT111German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space 01KD2215CGerman Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space 01KD2420EGerman Research Foundation 504101714German Research Foundation BR 1704/17-1German Research Foundation BR 1704/17-2German Research Foundation BR 1704/6-1German Research Foundation BR 1704/6-3German Research Foundation BR 1704/6-4German Research Foundation CH 117/1-1German Research Foundation HE 5998/2-1German Research Foundation HE 5998/2-2German Research Foundation HO 5117/2-1German Research Foundation HO 5117/2-2German Research Foundation KL 2354/3-1German Research Foundation KL 2354/3-2German Research Foundation RO 2270/8-1German Research Foundation RO 2270/8-2Interdisciplinary Research Program of the NCT (Germany)Leeds Biomedical Research CentreMax-Eder-Programme of the German Cancer Aid 70113864National Institute for Health and Care ResearchYorkshire Cancer Research L386Yorkshire Cancer Research L394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over recent years, several deep learning (DL) models have been presented to predict colorectal cancer (CRC) patient survival directly from haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained routine whole-slide images (WSIs). Unlike traditional studies that rely on manually defined histopathological features, weakly supervised DL allows training directly on clinical endpoints without prior specification of the model's focus. This offers a unique opportunity to study the tissue morphology underlying these predictions, improving our understanding of disease biology. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the clinicopathological features, tumour morphology and biology, as well as gene expression-based predicted drug response of over 4,000 CRC patients derived from four different international cohorts with available H&E-inferred DL-based risk scores (low- versus high-risk as well as absolute risk scores). The results from our study suggest that conventional clinicopathological risk factors, such as grade of differentiation, presence of lymph node metastasis, tumour budding, and percentage of tumour necrosis, are positively associated with DL-based risk scores. Moreover, CRCs with direct tumour-adipocyte interactions are enriched in the DL-based high-risk group. Through detailed morphologic review, we provide comprehensive evidence that direct tumour-adipocyte interaction, a high degree of tumour budding, and poorly differentiated morphology are linked to high DL-based risk scores. Transcriptomic and genetic subgroups show only limited association with H&E-derived DL-based risk scores. Moreover, we present data suggesting that DL-based low- versus high-risk CRCs may be characterised by differential drug sensitivity. Our study highlights that DL-based risk scores derived from H&E WSIs not only align with established clinicopathological features but also highlight morphological features, such as tumour-adipocyte interaction, that are not routinely captured by established clinicopathological scoring systems. Moreover, DL-based risk groups may be associated with a differential treatment response, underlining their potential to guide patient stratification in routine clinical practice. © 2026 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedBiomarkers, TumorGene Expression ProfilingHumansPredictive Learning ModelsPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkercolorectal cancercomputational pathologydeep learningdrug responsegene expressionhistopathologypathologywhole‐slide image

Identifiers

PMID41716034
PMCPMC13050814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.