Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716060›Full record

ReviewCurrent medical imaging2026

Two Deep Image Reconstructions for a 320-Row CT: Review of Clinical Applications

Wanhui Zhou, Sihua Zhong, Jing Li, Guozhi Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wanhui ZhouCollaborative Innovation, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai 201807, China.ORCID 0009-0004-2177-3528
Sihua ZhongCollaborative Innovation, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai 201807, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1450-6761
Jing LiCollaborative Innovation, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai 201807, China.ORCID 0009-0006-8350-685X
Guozhi ZhangCollaborative Innovation, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai 201807, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4819-3580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing popularity and clinical adoption of deep learning in CT image reconstruction, two distinct approaches have emerged under the concept of 'deep' reconstruction: Deep Learning Reconstruction (DLR) and Deep Iterative Reconstruction (DIR). Despite falling under the umbrella of 'deep' reconstruction, DLR and DIR differ in technical principle, clinical applicability, and reconstruction performance. This review aims to provide a clinically oriented overview of these two methods, emphasizing their coexistence and differentiated roles on a 320-row CT scanner platform, offering radiologists insights for clinical practice as well as inspirations for future research. On this platform, DLR and DIR represent complementary strategies in clinical practice, where DLR is implemented as a cardiac-specific algorithm and DIR for other bodyparts. By summarizing representative clinical applications, we highlight the advantages of DLR in cardiac CT and strengths of DIR across chest, abdominal, vascular, and perfusion CT imaging. Quantitative evidence from recent studies demonstrates consistent improvements of both DIR and cardiac-specific DLR over routine hybrid iterative reconstruction. Their complementary characteristics also suggest potential benefits when applied in multi-region CT imaging. In addition, the clinically valuable image features of DIR that merit further investigation, as well as other technical considerations relevant to 'deep' reconstructions are discussed.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansArtificial intelligenceClinical applications.Computed tomographyDeep iterative reconstructionDeep learning reconstructionImage qualityIterative reconstructionRadiation dose reduction

Identifiers

PMID41716060
PMCPMC13483111

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.