ReviewCurrent medical imaging2026
Two Deep Image Reconstructions for a 320-Row CT: Review of Clinical Applications
Review in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing popularity and clinical adoption of deep learning in CT image reconstruction, two distinct approaches have emerged under the concept of 'deep' reconstruction: Deep Learning Reconstruction (DLR) and Deep Iterative Reconstruction (DIR). Despite falling under the umbrella of 'deep' reconstruction, DLR and DIR differ in technical principle, clinical applicability, and reconstruction performance. This review aims to provide a clinically oriented overview of these two methods, emphasizing their coexistence and differentiated roles on a 320-row CT scanner platform, offering radiologists insights for clinical practice as well as inspirations for future research. On this platform, DLR and DIR represent complementary strategies in clinical practice, where DLR is implemented as a cardiac-specific algorithm and DIR for other bodyparts. By summarizing representative clinical applications, we highlight the advantages of DLR in cardiac CT and strengths of DIR across chest, abdominal, vascular, and perfusion CT imaging. Quantitative evidence from recent studies demonstrates consistent improvements of both DIR and cardiac-specific DLR over routine hybrid iterative reconstruction. Their complementary characteristics also suggest potential benefits when applied in multi-region CT imaging. In addition, the clinically valuable image features of DIR that merit further investigation, as well as other technical considerations relevant to 'deep' reconstructions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.