ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Digital Orthodontics: Posterior crossbite correction and arch expansion with directly 3-dimensional printed clear aligners.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterior crossbite correction and mandibular arch expansion have traditionally been managed with fixed appliances, while conventional thermoformed aligners have shown limited efficacy due to material properties and biomechanical constraints. This case report describes the management of bilateral premolar crossbite and mandibular constriction in a 26-year-old female using directly 3D-printed clear aligners (DPA) fabricated with a biocompatible resin. A complete digital workflow treatment planning was employed, and twenty-six aligners were produced using high-resolution LCD printing over a treatment period of thirty-one weeks. Posttreatment evaluation confirmed successful correction of the crossbite, stable arch expansion, and maintenance of posterior inclination control. Three-dimensional superimposition and colormap analysis demonstrated minimal relapse, less than 0.5 mm, at one-year follow-up. This report highlights the potential of DPA as a clinically effective alternative to thermoformed aligners for the correction of complex occlusal discrepancies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.