ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Performance and Limitations of Out-Of-Distribution Detection for Insect DNA Barcoding.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026Article
- Performance and Limitations of Out-Of-Distribution Detection for Insect DNA Barcoding.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful applications of DNA barcoding rely on the accurate taxonomic identification of sequence fragments. When biological surveys with DNA barcoding target underexplored biological communities, sequence-based identification is often conducted using incomplete databases that do not fully cover the regional species pool. Consequently, specimens to be identified may include species not present in reference databases. Such unknown or "out-of-distribution" samples can cause misidentification if left undetected. A similarity cutoff is commonly used to detect out-of-distribution samples before taxonomic assignment, but its effectiveness has not been carefully studied. In this study, we evaluated the performance of out-of-distribution detection for DNA barcoding with genetic distance and deep learning metrics. Using extensively sampled datasets of multiple insect taxa, we measured the performance of identification and out-of-distribution detection under conditions in which genetic variations in species were sufficiently sampled. Although identification with DNA barcoding is a highly accurate process, even with short noisy fragments, out-of-distribution detection was more susceptible to a reduction in performance due to sequence noise and a lack of diagnosable characters. When fragments shorter than 300 bp were used for out-of-distribution detection, large performance reductions were observed irrespective of detection methods. Our results provide guidelines for designing unknown-proof identification procedures by determining factors affecting out-of-distribution detection performance.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.