Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716582›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Performance and Limitations of Out-Of-Distribution Detection for Insect DNA Barcoding.

Tomochika Fujisawa, Takashi Imai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomochika FujisawaCenter for Data Science and AI Innovation Research Promotion Shiga University Hikone Shiga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4611-3727
Takashi ImaiDepartment of Data Science Shiga University Hikone Shiga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-4406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful applications of DNA barcoding rely on the accurate taxonomic identification of sequence fragments. When biological surveys with DNA barcoding target underexplored biological communities, sequence-based identification is often conducted using incomplete databases that do not fully cover the regional species pool. Consequently, specimens to be identified may include species not present in reference databases. Such unknown or "out-of-distribution" samples can cause misidentification if left undetected. A similarity cutoff is commonly used to detect out-of-distribution samples before taxonomic assignment, but its effectiveness has not been carefully studied. In this study, we evaluated the performance of out-of-distribution detection for DNA barcoding with genetic distance and deep learning metrics. Using extensively sampled datasets of multiple insect taxa, we measured the performance of identification and out-of-distribution detection under conditions in which genetic variations in species were sufficiently sampled. Although identification with DNA barcoding is a highly accurate process, even with short noisy fragments, out-of-distribution detection was more susceptible to a reduction in performance due to sequence noise and a lack of diagnosable characters. When fragments shorter than 300 bp were used for out-of-distribution detection, large performance reductions were observed irrespective of detection methods. Our results provide guidelines for designing unknown-proof identification procedures by determining factors affecting out-of-distribution detection performance.

Identifiers

PMID41716582
PMCPMC12912926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.