ReviewRSC advances2026
Carbon nanodots as theranostics agents in cancer: advances in design, targeting, and real-time monitoring.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Folic acid-functionalized polymer dots encapsulating deep red fluorescent carbon nanodots for specific imaging of folate-receptor-positive cancer cells.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Carbon Dots in Nanomedicine: Advanced Fabrication, Biomedical Applications, and Future Clinical Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon nanodots (CNDs) have emerged as a promising class of carbon-based nanomaterials for cancer theranostics, uniquely integrating diagnosis and therapy on a single platform. Their ultrasmall size, high aqueous dispersibility, tunable photoluminescence extending into the near-infrared (NIR) window, and compatibility with green, scalable synthesis enable deep-tissue imaging and targeted intervention with reduced systemic toxicity compared with many conventional nanomaterials. This review summarises recent advances in the top-down and bottom-up fabrication of CNDs, including heteroatom doping and surface functionalisation with ligands or stimuli-responsive linkers, and relates these design parameters to optical performance, tumour selectivity, and responsiveness to the tumour microenvironment. Particular emphasis is placed on CND-based platforms for multimodal imaging (fluorescence, MRI, and photoacoustic), controlled-release drug delivery, gene silencing, and light-activated photodynamic and photothermal therapies, as well as emerging synergistic systems that combine these functions for real-time, image-guided treatment. Remaining challenges, such as batch-to-batch variability, incomplete understanding of long-term biosafety (especially for metal-doped CNDs), and limited clinical-scale manufacturing and regulatory readiness, are critically discussed alongside future opportunities, including NIR-II optimisation, protein-corona-resistant surface engineering, and AI-assisted CND design for personalised cancer theranostics.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.