ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Exploratory Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sulfasalazine for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI)-Induced Colitis.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploratory Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sulfasalazine for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI)-Induced Colitis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The first-choice treatment for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced colitis is steroids; however, side effects may occur and survival may be reduced. Sulfasalazine (SSZ) is primarily used for inflammatory bowel disease but studies on ICI-induced colitis are scarce. This study examined the efficacy and safety of SSZ for ICI-induced colitis while testing SSZ as a steroid-sparing agent. Methods: This study (iRECSA) was a single-arm, multicenter exploratory study from November 2021 to December 2024 that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SSZ for mild-to-moderate ICI-induced colitis. SSZ was given at 4 g/day orally for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was clinical response (a ≥ 1-point reduction from baseline partial Mayo score or partial Mayo score < 1). Secondary endpoints included clinical responses in the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), Lichtiger Index, and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade, plus SSZ-related adverse event incidence. Results: Ten patients were enrolled. The median partial Mayo score decreased from 4 (range 3-5) to 2 (range 0-4), with 80% of patients achieving a clinical response. Similar response rates were observed with the Lichtiger Index and CTCAE grade. Defecation urgency was present in 70% of patients at baseline but resolved in all after treatment. Nine adverse events occurred in six patients; three patients discontinued SSZ because of hypersensitivity-related adverse events. Three patients required systemic steroids after the study treatment. Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that SSZ may be a useful option for mild-to-moderate ICI-induced colitis, but caution is warranted against SSZ-related hypersensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.