ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
AI-driven radiogenomics in gynecologic oncology: from radiological digital biopsy to a new paradigm in precision therapy.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- TCIA Radiology Image Processing for AI and Radiomics.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Autofluorescence and deep learning in early disease detection: biological foundations, clinical applications, and future directions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor heterogeneity is a core challenge in gynecologic oncology, driving therapeutic resistance and limiting the efficacy of single-point biopsies. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics are emerging as a "digital biopsy" to non-invasively decode tumor biology from medical radiological modalities images(including MRI, CT, and PET). This review synthesizes the state of AI in predicting key molecular features across gynecologic cancers, including homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in ovarian cancer, microsatellite instability (MSI) and PI3K activation in endometrial cancer, and, as an illustrative case, HPV integration and DNA methylation in cervical cancer. We further explore how advanced architectures like Vision Transformers (ViTs) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) can delineate the tumor microenvironment and predict therapeutic response. Finally, we discuss critical hurdles to clinical translation-such as model generalizability, the need for causal AI, and the data bottleneck-while examining future paradigms like foundation models and patient-specific "digital twins." This review highlights AI's revolutionary potential to link imaging phenotype with molecular genotype, advancing a new era of precision medicine in gynecologic oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.