ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Non-invasive neurostimulation techniques for the treatment of stimulant use disorders.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Addictive disorders remain important contributors to the overall burden of disease, and although many have established treatments, stimulant use disorders (StUDs) still lack effective management options. Neurostimulation techniques, such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, have attracted addiction medicine researchers and clinicians, with many studies showing promise in reducing cravings and improving other clinical outcomes in participants, as well as modulating relevant brain areas. As a result, research output in this area is increasing rapidly. This narrative review aims to assess currently available research data on non-invasive neurostimulation techniques in patients with StUDs to inform future research requirements and clinical applications. This review was conducted using a comprehensive search strategy across PubMed, OVID Medline and PsycINFO databases, using terms including "stimulant use disorder*", "transcranial magnetic stimulation" and "craving*". The initial search was intentionally broad to effectively assess the breadth of literature on neurostimulation in addiction disorders generally, resulting in the return of 1317 sources. Search results were uploaded to Covidence and screened for inclusion. Upon narrowing the scope to isolate StUDs, 179 sources were included for full-text review, with 90 included for extraction. The most common outcome measure assessed was craving, with cognition, affective symptoms, sleep, and use patterns other frequently assessed measures. Overall, the results appear promising, with non-invasive neurostimulation variably improving cravings, cognition and affective outcomes in patients with StUDs. However, this review identified some limitations that require further research attention, including small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, protocol heterogeneity, and ill-representative samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.