ReviewMedicines (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Anticonvulsant Therapy in Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Class-Oriented Systematic Review.
Review in Medicines (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Mechanisms and Brain Alterations in Orofacial Pain: A Narrative Review of Human Neuroimaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging Pharmacological Strategies for Trigeminal Neuralgia.CNS drugs · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTrigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is a chronic neuropathic condition characterized by sudden, severe facial pain. Anticonvulsants are the cornerstone of pharmacological management, yet comparative evidence based on pharmacological class remains scarce. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticonvulsants in TN, stratified by their mechanism of action.
methodsA systematic search in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies employing a pharmacological approach including human patients with TN, published in English since 2000, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2, the ROBINS-I and the ROBINS-E tools, according to the study design.
resultsOut of 922 initial records, 12 studies met the eligibility criteria. Sodium channel inhibitors showed high efficacy but frequent adverse effects, particularly hyponatremia and central nervous system symptoms. Calcium channel modulators offered a more favorable safety profile. Combination therapies showed benefits, levetiracetam and topiramate were moderately effective and well tolerated. Although the evidence has limitations, anticonvulsants continue to be the primary treatment for TN. Sodium-channel blockers demonstrate strong efficacy, whereas alternative agents generally provide superior tolerability.
conclusionsThese findings support selecting drugs according to their underlying mechanisms of action. Equally important is tailoring therapy to pain phenotype and patient characteristics, balancing mechanism with tolerability and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.