Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718297›Full record

ArticleReports (MDPI)2026

SLIPPERS Reconsidered: Clinical, Radiological, and Pathological Overlap with PACNS-A Case Report.

Inhar Esnaola Barriola, Celia Fernández Gonzalez, Teresa Cabada Giadas, María Victoria Zelaya Huerta, María Elena Erro Aguirre

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Reports (MDPI), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inhar Esnaola BarriolaNeurology Department, University Hospital of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-7172-3983
Celia Fernández GonzalezRadiology Department, University Hospital of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0006-0927-1298
Teresa Cabada GiadasRadiology Department, University Hospital of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
María Victoria Zelaya HuertaPathology Department, University Hospital of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3692-3515
María Elena Erro AguirreNeurology Department, University Hospital of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9707-4190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: SLIPPERS syndrome (Supratentorial Lymphocytic Inflammation with Parenchymal Perivascular Enhancement Responsive to Steroids) was first described in 2015 as a variant of CLIPPERS restricted to supratentorial regions. Only a few cases have been reported so far, and its distinction from primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) remains challenging, as both may present with overlapping clinical, radiological, and histopathological features. We report two patients initially diagnosed with SLIPPERS but finally fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for PACNS, highlighting the complexity of the differential diagnosis. Case Presentation: The first patient was a 49-year-old woman who presented with seizures, memory impairment, and facial neuralgia. MRI showed multiple cortico-subcortical and deep nodular lesions in the left hemisphere with gadolinium enhancement. Brain biopsy revealed a T-cell-predominant lymphocytic vascular infiltrate. She responded to corticosteroids but later relapsed, requiring methotrexate for long-term immunosuppression, with no further recurrences during seven years of follow-up. The second patient was a 64-year-old man with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and alcohol use who developed repeated focal-to-generalized seizures. MRI disclosed multifocal nodular gadolinium-enhancing right hemispheric lesions, with SWI microhemorrhages. Biopsy demonstrated transmural T-cell vasculitic infiltrates. He responded to corticosteroids and methotrexate, but radiological progression at 14 months prompted replacement with cyclophosphamide. Conclusions: There is a considerable clinical, radiological, and histological overlap between SLIPPERS and PACNS. Careful analysis of advanced MRI sequences, particularly angiographic and vessel-wall imaging studies, combined with meticulous histopathological analysis, is essential to avoid misdiagnosis. These similarities suggest that some cases attributed to SLIPPERS may, in fact, correspond to variants of PACNS.

Indexed as

brain biopsycase reportimmunosuppressive therapymagnetic resonance imagingprimary angiitis of the central nervous systemSLIPPERS syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41718297
PMCPMC12922086

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.