ArticleMethods and protocols2026
Enhancing Omics Analyses Through Coalitional Games and Shapley Values.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe a comprehensive methodology for the application of game theory to omics data analysis, with a particular focus on coalitional games and Shapley values. This approach evaluates the cooperative distribution of genes within high-dimensional transcriptomics datasets, providing a complementary perspective to conventional statistical methods. We present the mathematical framework, implementation details, and references for applications that demonstrate its ability to improve the detection of biologically meaningful signals that may not be explicitly modeled by many conventional statistical methods. Our results highlight the potential of coalitional game theory as a powerful tool for enhancing reproducibility and interpretability in omics research, opening new perspectives in systems biology and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.