Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718766›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

Retrieval-augmented generation-enhanced large language models for comprehensive CAD-RADS 2.0 categorization from structured coronary CTA reports.

Esat Kaba, Yusuf Çubukçu, Burak Uzunibrahimoğlu, Yusuf Enes Yılmaz, Mehmet Çınar, Serdar Tabakoğlu, Elif Merve Bal, Yaprak Seren Beydüz, Merve Solak, Evin Oğuz and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Esat KabaDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye. esatkaba04@gmail.com.
Yusuf ÇubukçuDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Burak UzunibrahimoğluDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Yusuf Enes YılmazDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Mehmet ÇınarDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Serdar TabakoğluDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Elif Merve BalDepartment of Radiology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Yaprak Seren BeydüzDepartment of Radiology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Merve SolakDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Evin OğuzDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Ayşenur Topçu VarlıkDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Gökçen MalkoçDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Mehmet BeyazalDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Fatma Beyazal CelikerDepartment of Radiology, Training and Research Hospital, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Türkiye.
Selçuk AkkayaDepartment of Radiology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs), including retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-based approaches, in extracting components and management recommendations from structured coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) reports according to the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS 2.0). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 320 fully structured CCTA reports were analyzed using LLM. Closed-source standard ChatGPT‑5, NotebookLM (RAG-based model), and a RAG-adapted ChatGPT‑5 model (ChatGPT-5-RAG) were used. Each model extracted the CAD-RADS category, plaque burden, presence of high-risk plaque (HRP), other modifiers, full score, and management recommendations in accordance with the CAD-RADS 2.0 guidelines. We compared LLM outputs with reference standards determined by two expert cardiovascular radiologists.

resultsChatGPT-5-RAG showed the highest accuracy for CAD-RADS classification (0.959, 95% CI: 0.932-0.976), plaque burden (0.912, 95% CI: 0.876-0.939), HRP detection (0.988, 95% CI: 0.968-0.995), other modifiers (0.950, 95% CI: 0.920-0.969), and full score (0.828, 95% CI: 0.783-0.866). Closed-source ChatGPT‑5 showed the weakest performance across all components. Significant statistical differences were found among the three models (p < 0.001). Management recommendations were qualitatively rated on a three-point Likert scale; although agreement between models was low, ChatGPT-5-RAG and NotebookLM performed almost perfectly (median 3 points).

conclusionThis study demonstrates that RAG-enhanced LLMs significantly improve accuracy and reliability in extracting CAD-RADS 2.0 components and generating clinical management recommendations. The findings highlight the potential of RAG-based LLMs as innovative, explainable tools for automated and standardized CCTA reporting in clinical radiology workflows.

Indexed as

Coronary computed tomography angiographyCoronary StenosisLarge language modelsManagementPlaque burden

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.