Evidence mapPaperPMID 41718868Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

Stress, Well-Being, and Reproduction in Wildlife.

Katie L Edwards, Janine Brown, Ashley N Edes, Kathleen E Hunt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katie L EdwardsScience Department, North of England Zoological Society, Chester Zoo, Upton-by-Chester, UK. k.edwards@chesterzoo.org.
Janine BrownCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian National Zoological Park and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
Ashley N EdesDepartment of Reproductive and Behavioral Sciences, Saint Louis Zoo, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Kathleen E HuntDepartment of Biology, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To reverse the trend of declining wildlife populations globally, individuals must be provided with conditions that allow them to thrive, not just survive. It is no longer only the remit of conservation breeding programs to ensure animal well-being to promote reproduction; in situ conservation efforts must also consider how environmental and anthropogenic pressures impact wild populations and how to mitigate them, especially with regard to reproduction and survival. Stress and welfare are complex concepts that necessitate an understanding of how stressors affect animals on both individual and population levels, and how the subsequent impact on reproduction can vary. There are species differences in how factors impact well-being, related in part to natural history, which are also shaped by individual perceptions and coping abilities. A multitude of stress-related responses then have the potential to disrupt reproduction on many levels and, ultimately, fitness. A major limitation to advancing welfare science is the lack of definitive tests to verify welfare status, that is, is the animal thriving, or just surviving? While analyses of circulating or excreted glucocorticoids (GCs) have for decades been the primary method of assessing stress, today we recognize the need for more comprehensive indicators that reflect multiple physiological systems, including behavior, to assess both negative and positive welfare states. In this chapter, we discuss the potential for stress not only to disrupt but also sometimes to facilitate reproduction, including the key role that GCs play. We then discuss several other physiological biomarkers that have the potential to assess well-being in the context of reproduction and conclude with multi-biomarker approaches, which, if applied to wildlife, could be powerful tools for conservation and could help to elucidate the complex relationship between stress and reproduction.

Indexed as

Animals, WildAnimal WelfareReproductionStress, PhysiologicalStress, PsychologicalAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesGlucocorticoidsGlucocorticoidsAllostatic loadBiomarkersGlucocorticoidsImmune systemMorbidityMortalityReproductionStressWelfareWell-beingWildlife

Identifiers

PMID41718868

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.