Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718893›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Multidimensional analysis of postoperative nursing challenges in oral cancer surgery: a retrospective study of 245 patients and proposal of the PROTECT mode.

Dandan Shi, Meng Zhang, Pei Hu, Hongyun Liu, Qiaoyi Zheng, Ju Tian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dandan Shi *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, 2 Sunwen East Road, Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528400, China.
Meng Zhang *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, 2 Sunwen East Road, Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528400, China.
Pei HuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, 2 Sunwen East Road, Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528400, China.
Hongyun LiuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, 2 Sunwen East Road, Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528400, China.
Qiaoyi ZhengDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, 2 Sunwen East Road, Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528400, China. 10688360@qq.com.
Ju TianDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, 2 Sunwen East Road, Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528400, China. tian-ju@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe quality of postoperative care for oral tumors critically influences patient prognosis and quality of life; however, current nursing systems for oral cancer often lack standardization, personalization, and continuity.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 245 patients with oral cancer who underwent tumor resection combined with flap reconstruction between February 2022 and February 2025. The study focused on four core dimensions: complication management, nutritional support, functional rehabilitation, and continuity of care. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25, including chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOf 218 patients with flap reconstruction, 184 (75.1%) received pedicled flaps and 34 (13.9%) free flaps. Free flaps were associated with a significantly higher overall complication rate (82.4% vs. 40.2%, P < 0.001), particularly pulmonary infections, flap necrosis/venous crisis (both P < 0.05). Operative time was the sole independent risk factor for complications (OR = 1.54, P = 0.016). Only 30.2% (74 cases) completed NRS-2002 within 72 h postoperatively. Malnutrition showed a bimodal pattern (acute insufficient intake, chronic metabolic disorders), and 42% (103 cases) had "swallowing-nutrition mismatch" requiring enteral/parenteral nutrition. Dysphagia (31.8%), speech impairment (29%), and limited mouth opening (20%) were common, correlating with surgical extent and requiring 1-4 months of rehabilitation. At 2 weeks post-discharge, 30% (74 cases) lost home-care skills. Of 13 readmissions within 30 days (5.3%), 30.8% (4 cases) were avoidable due to preventable airway/nutrition/infection issues.

conclusionCurrent postoperative nursing for oral cancer exhibits significant gaps in flap-specific interventions, dynamic nutritional assessment, personalized rehabilitation, and continuity support. To address these challenges, we propose the PROTECT model as a conceptual framework for future prospective evaluation. This framework is designed to integrate four core components: (1) multimodal machine learning algorithms for identifying high-risk patients, (2) mobile health apps to standardize early nutrition screening, (3) AI-driven tools for generating personalized rehabilitation plans, and (4) smart nurse-physician collaboration platforms to reinforce home-care skills and enable rapid emergency response. The model aims to provide a structured approach to improve precision, continuity, and long-term quality of life in postoperative care, pending empirical validation through future studies.

Indexed as

Mouth NeoplasmsPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional SupportPlastic Surgery ProceduresQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurgical FlapsComplication managementFlap reconstructionOral cancer surgeryPostoperative nursing

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.