Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41718960›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2026

Post-vitrectomy Macular Edema: Shedding Light on Incidence and Risk Factors.

Viktor Verplaetse, Elon H C van Dijk, Koorosh Faridpooya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Viktor VerplaetseDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Elon H C van DijkDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.h.c.van_dijk@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6351-7942
Koorosh FaridpooyaDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-surgical macular edema is a common cause of delayed visual recovery. Although its occurrence after cataract surgery is well known, the specifics on post-vitrectomy macular edema (PVME) are less readily available in the recent literature. This narrative review identifies a wide-ranging incidence due to heterogeneous surgical indications, study designs, and lack of diagnostic standards in the current literature. PVME requiring pharmacological treatment ranges from 2.0 to 27.3%. Higher rates of macular edema are encountered after vitrectomy for retinal detachment, retained lens fragments, and epiretinal membranes. The intraretinal cystic changes after epiretinal membrane removal, however, often represent remnants of tractional disease, rather than true macular edema. This review elaborates on several patient-related and surgical risk factors, mostly in retinal detachment surgery. Predisposing factors are redetachment, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, silicone oil tamponades, extensive retinopexy, and macular involvement in cases with a retinal detachment. Patients who undergo procedures for macular holes, vitreous floaters, and secondary lens implantation appear less susceptible to developing PVME. Furthermore, higher rates of PVME are seen after crystalline lens removal, both in combined phacoemulsification-vitrectomy and when cataract surgery is performed after the vitrectomy. Additional research should lead to improved risk assessment and a reduced burden of this clinical issue.

Indexed as

Macular edemaPars plana vitrectomyPost-surgical macular edemaPost-vitrectomy macular edemaVitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID41718960
PMCPMC12976256

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.