ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2026
Intrinsic network static and dynamic functional connectivity associated with induced affect.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Loneliness exacerbates age differences in the -allostatic-interoceptive system during induced affect.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The examination of the neural mechanisms of affect has shifted from a functional localization approach towards a distributed network neuroscience approach. The present study examined the topology of brain networks relevant to affective processing [i.e. the salience (SN), default mode (DMN), ventral attention (VAN), dorsal attention (DAN), and frontoparietal (FPN) networks] during a novel fMRI-based affect-induction task in which participants (N = 73) mentally visualized neutral, positive, and negative self-nominated acquaintances. We used graph-theory metrics to compute the static (i.e. mean) and dynamic (i.e. time-varying) functional integration of networks with the rest of the brain (using participation coefficient) and within-network coherence (using within-module degree). Static DAN within-module degree differentiated the negative from the neutral condition, whereas dynamic VAN participation coefficient differentiated the negative from the positive condition. These results are consistent with the constructionist account that emotions emerge from flexible network configurations and contribute to growing network-based understandings of affective processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.