Evidence mapPaperPMID 41720472Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of perinatology2026

Acceptability and Feasibility of an Educational Intervention to Improve Researcher-Participant Interactions in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Clinical Trial: Research Team Feedback on the BRIEF Intervention.

Stephanie A Kraft, Devan M Duenas, Andrea Kelsh, Ellie Oslin, Megan M Gray, Sandra E Juul, Elliott M Weiss, BRIEF-DIVI Collaborative

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie A KraftDepartment of Bioethics and Decision Sciences, Geisinger College of Health Sciences, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2862-7601
Devan M DuenasTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Andrea KelshTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Ellie OslinTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Megan M GrayDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3272-9432
Sandra E JuulDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Elliott M WeissTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-9638
BRIEF-DIVI Collaborative

Funding

Improving Diversity in Neonatal Clinical Trial EnrollmentK23HD103872 · NICHD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · 2023 to 2025
$321k
Respect for Persons in the Genomics Research Enrollment Process: Incorporating Diverse Experiences and AttitudesK01HG010361 · NHGRI · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Stephanie A Kraft · 2022 to 2023
$259k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development K23HD103872National Institutes of Health, through the National Human Genome Research Institute K01HG010361NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG010361NHGRI NIH HHS K01HG010361NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD103872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions with families are essential to successful recruitment conversations that promote informed decision-making about clinical research enrollment. However, there is little evidence about how to implement communication-oriented recruitment training among pediatric clinical research teams. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of Better Research Interactions for Every Family (BRIEF), a multipart educational intervention to improve relationship-based conversations about clinical trial enrollment with families in the neonatal setting.We piloted BRIEF in partnership with a neonatal clinical research team. Research team members completed surveys following the BRIEF intervention's online module and the BRIEF group training session. They completed self-assessments after consent discussions before and after the BRIEF intervention, in which they rated their achievement of recruitment skills taught in BRIEF. Research team members also completed a final study interview to provide feedback on the intervention components, training content, and use of skills in practice.All nine research team members completed all components of BRIEF. Survey responses showed moderate to low satisfaction with previous recruitment training before BRIEF and high satisfaction with the BRIEF training. Self-assessments showed significant increases in reported partnership with bedside nursing (

Identifiers

PMID41720472
PMCPMC13055289

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.