Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41720482›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2026

Global Inequities in Unpaid Cancer Caregiving: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Time and Cost Burden.

Lan Gao, Neha Das, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Natalie Winter, Stephanie Cowdery, Victoria White, Patricia M Livingston

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lan GaoDeakin Health Economics, School of Health & Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Neha DasDeakin Health Economics, School of Health & Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2426-9622
Shalika Bohingamu MudiyanselageDeakin Health Economics, School of Health & Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Natalie WinterCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Stephanie CowderyCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Victoria WhiteSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6619-8484
Patricia M LivingstonCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6616-3839

Funding

Cancer Strategy Unit, Victorian Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnpaid caregiving is a critical but often under-recognised component of the cancer care continuum. As cancer prevalence rises globally, particularly in lower-income countries, quantifying the time and economic burden of unpaid caregiving across regions is essential for health resource planning, economic participation and support services. This systematic review aimed to quantify the global burden of unpaid cancer caring by examining care hours and associated costs, disaggregated by country income level based on the Socio-Demographic Index (SDI).

methodsWe systematically searched databases for studies published up to January 2026 that reported unpaid cancer caregiving hours and/or costs. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively, and where appropriate, pooled using random-effects meta-analysis for unpaid care hours. Study quality was assessed using standard checklists appropriate to the study design.

resultsTwenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, with the majority conducted in high-income countries. Unpaid care hours ranged from 1.3 to 113.8 h per week, with a pooled estimate of 48.35 h (95% CI: 17.81-78.89), though heterogeneity was high (I

conclusionsUnpaid carers dedicate substantial time to support people living with and beyond cancer, offering essential assistance that fills critical gaps in health services. This contribution represents a substantial economic burden that remains largely uncompensated. There is a striking lack of data from low- and middle-income countries, where the incidence of cancer is rising, and unpaid care resources are limited. Future research must prioritise recognition, valuation and support for unpaid carers, thus helping increase economic productivity, particularly in underserved settings.

Indexed as

CaregiversCost of IllnessDeveloping CountriesNeoplasmsGlobal HealthHealth Care CostsHumansCancerinformal caresocio‐demographic index

Identifiers

PMID41720482
PMCPMC12928049

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.