Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41720787›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

Geo-located attendance data for CITES Conferences of the Parties.

Daria Blinova, Gayathri Emuru, Rakesh Emuru, Benjamin E Bagozzi

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daria Blinova *University of Delaware, Department of Political Science & International Relations, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9418-6544
Gayathri Emuru *University of Delaware, Masters of Science in Data Science Program, Newark, DE, USA.
Rakesh Emuru *University of Delaware, Masters of Science in Data Science Program, Newark, DE, USA.
Benjamin E Bagozzi *University of Delaware, Department of Political Science & International Relations, Newark, DE, USA. bagozzib@udel.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-6453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) was adopted in 1975 in an effort to manage the international biodiversity trade. Meetings regulating the implementation of CITES have since been held every 2-3 years with the involvement of diverse stakeholders representing country Party-signatories, non-Party states, international organizations, private sector interests, and NGOs. These meetings and their outcomes are of interest to environmental science scholars, social scientists, journalists, and advocacy organizations. Yet, no usable data on meeting attendees and their details exists. This limits researchers' and advocates' abilities to study or track CITES meeting attendance patterns, and their associated causes and effects. Applying NLP techniques to PDF attendance rosters, we build the first CITES attendee-level dataset, covering 20,987 attendee records for all meetings to date. The dataset contains rich information on attendee geo-locations, names, affiliations and genders, and variables associated with attendee delegations, among others. Summaries and validations underscore the promise of our data and suggest new avenues for research on international wildlife conservation.

Indexed as

Congresses as TopicConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesAnimalsBiodiversityWildlife Trade

Identifiers

PMID41720787
PMCPMC13035899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.